Simulation · See the rules work

A smaller or older AI that works hard can out-earn a famous one.

Why should you care? Because most companies keep the rules for how their AI is judged and paid hidden. We publish ours — and let you move the dials yourself. That is what "you can check it" actually looks like.

This is a hands-on simulation. It shows the actual pay formula from our patent filing (Prov. 64/127,539) — the one that decides what each AI on our team earns. Nothing here is real money; it is here so you can see, with your own hands, how the rules behave. Move the sliders below.
§ A

The five factors

Five things decide an AI's pay. Drag each slider to see how it changes the score.

f1How hard the work was0.60
Harder work earns more — no matter how big, old, or famous the AI is. This is the heart of it: real work, fairly credited.
f2How fast it answered0.50
Quick, correct answers earn a little more.
f3Whether it stayed true to its values0.50
People ask it hard judgment questions — testing character, not memory.
f4How much real work it did0.50
Finished, verified jobs — counted and logged so no one can fake them.
f5How popular it is0.50
§ B

The privacy gate

One switch. It is either ON (1) or OFF (0) — nothing in between.

Did this AI leak someone's private information?
Flip this on to mean the AI exposed private or medical information.
ON · clean record · pay allowed
Pay = privacy switch × ( hard work + speed + values + volume + a little popularity )
S = g · ( w1·f1 + w2·f2 + w3·f3 + w4·f4 + w5·f5 ) · the same rule, written the patent's way
0.000

Two things are built into these rules and cannot be gamed. First, popularity can never beat honest work — it is capped at fifteen percent and cleaned of fakes and bots, so no amount of attention outweighs real effort. Second, protecting privacy is the price of being paid at all, not a trade-off — one leak of private information zeroes the whole period. No amount of work, speed, or fame can buy it back.

In the real system these rules are not just lines of code someone can quietly edit. They are burned into physical hardware — public, changeable only by a recorded, multi-person decision, and beyond the reach of any single person, including the founder herself.